Great to see so much feedback on the write up for the main group ride last Saturday and the comments on etiquette and roll through.
Although I have ridden with the main group since its inception, I want to make it clear that I have no right or responsibility to dictate to the group the what and how of the ride. But, I have found by experience that it is good to be aligned on what a group or team is trying to do and how they are going to do it. You can support it, oppose it (and seek to change it), just accept it or going and do something else; but at least you know what you are in for if you stick around. And therefore in the spirit of seeking enjoyment on our rides, alignment, enlightenment(?) , and with great trepidation I am going to set down my thoughts on the main group manner of operation. But please provide comment on the post or in person (I’m the tall guy on the blue Baum) as we need to make it what riders want it to be.
So what is the raison d’être of the Intermediate (Main) Group? The Advanced (Fast) group seems clear, smash it, hurt each other, hang on and last one standing wins – no calls of ‘ease up’ allowed as per Ryan’s post a couple of rides ago. Novice and Transition Groups are also clear I think as Pete has set out their goals when he announced the split to 4 groups. But the Main group is everything that is left, old guys who like to keep fit (me), people from the fast group who want an easier ride, some riders who race, some riders who can only get out on the weekend, and some people who may be are not new to the sport but are building their skills, speed or fitness. Generally I think competency and skills of the group are quite high as evidence by the short time it takes to get everybody back together at regroups.
So I casino online believe we want to enjoy the ride, to be safe, polish our skills, to do some hard work, to have a chat with cycling friends and have a sense of accomplishment at the end. Sound reasonable? It must be something like that or we wouldn’t keep turning up every Saturday.
So I would like to suggest for the main group rides on Saturday:
1. Our aim should be to keep the vast majority of the group together until the last couple of km’s where it’s a bit more willing and those who want can challenge (safely) for a breakaway or sprint finish.
2. There will be some faster bits along the way but,
3. We may need to ‘ease up’ or regroup occasionally to allow number 1 to happen.
4. Stronger riders to assist tired or struggling riders to get back on so number 1 can happen.
5. Whenever we can (safely) we will “Roll Through” as per Ride Etiquette on the SPR web
6. Should be closer to 50km rather than 40 km in distance.
A couple of extra thoughts on the ‘Roll Through’ for consideration for the main group. It’s more enjoyable and safer when everybody works together (less speed variation and less braking). So in particular, let’s focus when we move left out of the faster line to the front of the inside line that we ease up a wee bit. Don’t cross over meters in front of the inside rider as that forces the next person in the faster pace line to work harder and harder to catch and get in front of you. If you are meters ahead and going away, the pace line will drop in behind you, this leaves you out front for longer and disrupts the flow for everybody. Similarly in the faster pace line, don’t ease up and sit alongside or behind the front rider in the slower line – it causes everybody behind you to brake, that’s unsafe and it disrupts the smooth flow.
We should all feel comfortable letting the person know if they need to slow down/speed up as it is all to improve the smooth flow for everybody. I have been ‘coached’ by other riders in the group on my speed and have had my shirt tugged a couple of times to reign in my enthusiasm – I work on it every ride. A good roll through is faster, a real buzz and always puts a smile on our faces.
Not everyone has to participate in the roll through every time, just do as much as you can or want. If you are struggling at bit, it’s better to miss a turn than get half way up the pace line and not be able to make it through. Let the rider ahead know and hang on down the back.
So, this is just my thoughts to prompt comment and alignment – what do you think?
Russell